Research into volunteering in the NHS: Creating light not heat

Following on from the previous post’s criticism of NHS England and the DHSC’s approach to researching volunteering in the NHS, this piece seeks to find a way forward. A way that embraces the best of organisational cultures and promotes working relationships. A way that generates light rather than heat.

This proposal is based on a number of premises:

  • Everyone is working hard and committed to providing the best service possible for their beneficiaries. NHS staff & volunteers, voluntary sector staff & volunteers and policy makers alike.
  • All public sector and voluntary sector organisations want to have positive relationships with each other.
  • The greatest value is gained by exploring and celebrating what is working well, rather than what is not.

So, what to investigate? Where is the pinch point, where the secrets of what is working well can be discovered?

The answer might be found back in 1948, where the then Minister of Health, Aneurin Bevan said to those who had volunteered to support health care before the NHS was formed: “Watch to see where the shoe pinches first … and if the nation cannot do it, there your voluntary services will be required”

This would suggest achieving best value for this research, would be to look at where the shoe pinches: the point where public sector and voluntary sector services touch each other.

…but no-one who is working hard to support the NHS wants to have an intrusive investigation, with the associated negative connotations of accountability associated with it. So maybe the research piece needs to give everyone a break, and help to support what they do want.

They would love to have:

  • A celebration of what they are currently doing well in working in partnership.
  • Lots of ideas and tips from similar organisations to improve things.

For example, one outcome would be case studies of great partnership working, ones that the organisations involved can be proud of, and others can be inspired by…. creating an organic evolution of partnership working, that aligns with the principle of ‘spontaneous order’, which is so fundamental to the voluntary sector.

A research methodology that would help to achieve this is ‘Appreciative Inquiry’ that poses a central question ‘When have things gone really well what can we learn and apply from those moments of success?’.

NHS staff & volunteers, voluntary sector staff & volunteers and policy makers – who wouldn’t want this?

The links between primary and secondary care and the Voluntary Sector are key here, and this is where the Voluntary, Community and Social Enterprise (VCSE) Health and Wellbeing Alliance offers some potential. However, if you look at the partners, the voluntary sector organisations that are linked to hospitals are largely missing. Once this is resolved this piece of research offers significant value to so many.

The life and times of volunteer management qualifications

Let there be volunteer management!

One winters day in 1963 at Fulbourne Hospital in Cambridgeshire, an unspecified number of cloak-clad senior managers huddled around a dimly lit NHS desk-lamp, and decided to advertise a post for a paid voluntary services organiser…

So voluntary services were henceforth organised. But sometimes they needed managing, other times they needed to be led, and on frequent occasions needed to be supported and negotiated.

Someone decided that the people doing the voluntary services organising/management/leading/supporting/negotiating needed some training to do all these things, and this decision begat many training courses. Most course outlines started life as notes on napkins, beermats, the back of cigarette packets. The course outlines begat trainers and the trainers begat lots of delivery to any volunteer manager could get their organisation to fund a day’s training for them.

Let there be volunteer management qualifications!

Then in 2005, someone said “Where are the accredited training programmes for people who manage volunteers?”. There was much tumbleweed, and no-one responded…

… until a consortium led by Attend liaised with the CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development), to tailor the Certificate in Personnel Practice, for people managing volunteers.

In parallel to this, Skills Third Sector were developing the National Occupational Standards for Volunteer Managers, which were adopted by the Institute of Leadership and Management (now ILM), who developed a suite of accredited programmes, just for volunteer management.  In the words of Sue Jones (Warrington Voluntary Action) “there was something special about volunteer management being part of ILM. It felt grown-up, like we were finally sitting at the main table, rather than being on the sidelines, sitting at the camping table with the kids.”

There were accredited programmes designed for people managing volunteers on a day-to-day basis, and for those managing volunteering programmes, and these were delivered all over everywhere. Volunteer Management was now being recognised by awarding bodies, employers and funders as credible and worth the investment.

…and then all of a sudden they weren’t. Government funding dried up, and employers decided the programmes were not so attractive if funding them came from their own budgets!

So the ILM, seeing the reduction in registrations started withdrawing ‘unviable’ programmes from their portfolio, and today the only one left is the Level 3 Award in the Management of Volunteers – the shortest of their programmes. The Level 4 and 5 programmes now sit destined to gathering e-dust in the forgotten clouds.

So, here we go again… in 2019, Attend liaised with the CMI (Chartered Management Institute), to tailor the Level 5 Certificate in Management and Leadership, for people managing volunteers. The sector once again has a nationally accredited qualification tailored for those managing volunteering programmes.

Maybe that’s where volunteer management needs to sit? As part of a mainstream national management and leadership qualification, where folks can obtain a qualification recognised by employers, tailored to volunteer management, and transferable to the wider world of work, thus future proofing the careers of those who study and pass the programme.

…maybe this approach might be more attractive to those holding the purse strings of staff development budgets!

Research into volunteering in the NHS

In June this year Dr Neil Churchill, Director for People and Communities at NHS England blogged about the need to invest more in NHS volunteering to reap the benefits for patients, staff and the volunteers.

The Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England periodically fund research and discuss volunteering in the NHS. However, the focus tends to be on directly managed volunteers in a hospital setting, rather than volunteering in a wider health setting, with direct and indirect links to the NHS.

Dr Churchill’s blog and the associated report also adopt this approach. However, one can’t help feeling that something is missing…

The people…over 3 million of them!

So, there are a few hundred thousand volunteers in England who are managed by hospital volunteer managers, but according to the Department of Health’s Strategic Vision for Volunteering“around 3.4 million people volunteer in health alone”, indicating the vast majority of volunteering within the NHS happens within independent organisations that support the work of the NHS.

For example, local hospital friends groups, who between them have 25,000-35,000 volunteers and 10 times that number of supporters in the community.

So, NHS related research and conversations tend to studiously ignore the bigger picture. Why is this?

  • Unaware? Is it because the DHSC and NHS England are not aware that the majority of volunteering in health and social care happens within independent organisations that support the work of the NHS?
  • Too difficult? Is researching the many and diverse ways in which 3.4 million volunteers contribute to the work of the NHS too complex for the researchers, or that they haven’t got access to these volunteering networks?
  • Too expensive? Would researching this vast field of volunteering cost too much money?
  • Can’t see the point? Is it that NHS staff feel they have enough volunteers for the roles that can exist within a hospital setting, and that there is no vision or appetite for engaging the wider community?
  • Is it political (small ‘p’)? Is it because this volunteering is part of the wider community and cannot be controlled with the same rules… and that the research findings are likely to point to a need for a different, more nuanced approach to volunteer engagement, which is not within the skills set of many NHS staff?

Whatever the reason, the research hasn’t been done and steadfastly continues not to be done. This is a travesty, when one considers the first line of the NHS constitution is:“The NHS belongs to the people.”

Any volunteering strategy needs to create a climate where people can help where they can, and it’s the role of NHS organisations to engage the community first, and manage volunteers second.

To date however, none of the published research focuses on the first ‘strategy’ of community engagement. It focuses on the second ‘tactic’ of managing volunteers. Ever since hospitals set up their own volunteering programmes in the mid 1960s, it appears the horse has followed the cart, and keeps following the cart. It’s tactics without strategy, which according to Sun Tzu,  is “The noise before defeat“.

So, after the positive public response to the NHS during the Covid-19 pandemic, we have an opportunity to get this right. Someone, somewhere in the NHS needs to get this, and explore how to engage the community first and manage volunteers second.

For example, this could take the form of researching where community engagement works well in particular parts of the NHS. There could be exploration of instances where independent organisations and hospitals work well together, and what makes this work well, like a MoU they have worked on between them.

We just need to see what good looks like and then share this to the people (the managers, the staff, the volunteers, the community groups, the press, the politicians and the wider public). The NHS belongs to all these people …

Wellbeing…

Can we now bin the term ‘work-life’ balance’?

Back in 2013, I was bemoaning the oft-used term ‘work-life balance’.

My beef was that the opposite of work isn’t life and the opposite of life isn’t work, and that many people can at times feel more alive at work than when not at work.

It shouldn’t be about a battle between the two, but how the two can coexist. If this wasn’t so imperative back in 2013 (which I would suggest it was), it is especially so now, with the practice of working from home being accepted and normalised, as we all sought to ensure our organisations could support our beneficiaries during the various pandemic lockdowns.

So I was rather encouraged to read this month’s MHFAEngland blog written by their Chief Executive, Simon Blake, discussing the third My Whole Self Day, taking place on 18 March 2022.

The term wellbeing is central to this initiative, and Simon says(!) “We know that wellbeing and productivity fuel one another. Work done well gives us purpose and contributes to our sense of identity, it creates connections and relationships and opens us to new experiences. It can be joyful and fun.”

So maybe we can assign the term work-life balance to the dustbin of out-dated concepts and focus on embracing wellbeing in the workplace?

The bonus is that the term ‘wellbeing’ is also relevant to our non-work existence, so no balance needed, just our whole selves wherever we are and whatever we are doing. 😀

Leadership styles

Ideas happen in the most unlikely of places

There is this thing called the deliberation-without-attention affect, which can be translated as ‘having an idea on the loo!’

So, today’s hosting loo is in The King’s Fund. A splendid room of class and elegance – with marble floor and walls, lavish wallpaper, bespoke fittings, a chandelier and Classic FM enhancing the ambience for the grateful visitor.

However, today’s visit revealed a shocking situation. The doorstop had come loose and was the wrong way around! 😲

Further inspection shows unmistakable damage to the door. Where there should have just been a rubber marking, where the door opened onto the stopper, there was now paint missing and damage to the woodwork. 😥

This room has been serving staff and visitors for many years, but amidst the business of the day, the relationship between the door stop and the door was under strain.

Pacesetting and affiliative leadership

The damage to the door wasn’t intentional, it just happened whilst people were going about their busy day.

So who hasn’t experienced life in a fast moving organisation where busy days mean everything has to be completed by the ‘close of play’, or preferably yesterday? In many workplaces the current challenges of keeping the show on the road, means that ‘pacesetting‘ is becoming a default leadership style. Keeping everyone on their toes to optimise production. It’s all ‘Go – Go – Go!

According to Daniel Goleman, this style works best when ‘quick results are needed from a highly motivated and competent team’. So if we’ve got a great team everything’s good – and we can carry on ‘go-go-go-ing’…

But if this is the only leadership style , Goleman highlights the ‘overall impact on climate‘ can be negative. Staff can feel stressed, relationships feel transactional and burnout can occur. Staff turnover increases as folks vote with their feet as soon as a more palatable employment opportunity appears, and the transient workforce feel less and less connected with each other.

So maybe we should ditch the pacesetting style altogether?

But we can’t – everything will fall apart if we don’t keep the show on the road. Something else is needed…

Staff need to feel trusted that they can deliver what they are capable of and that a request for support or flexibility, or whatever might help will be received with warmth. They need something that cushions the impact of the constant push of the pace. Something like the rubber part of the door stopper.

The ‘affiliative‘ style has something to offer here. It helps to ‘motivate people during stressful circumstances’, and is all about empathy, building relationships and constructive communication.

We might ask…“Isn’t this all a bit ‘pie-in-the-sky’ and aspirational?…Where do we find time in the day to do all that stuff?” Well, how about during the next Zoom call or Teams meeting. Just spend a few extra minutes warming up to the meeting, have a chat, check in with people on how they are doing. Spend some time ‘being’ with your team. Go to the meeting with the fundamental assumption that your staff will deliver everything they are capable of, and will flag up if they get in a muddle. Enjoy the chatter and lose yourself in the company of those you are with, whoever it may be. Allow some ‘play’ in the conversations. Do everything you can to encourage folks to enjoy their time with you, and each other. Trust that your team want to and can deliver.

This might mean that a meeting might overrun, and allow less time for the ‘do-do-doing’ and the ‘go-go-going’… So what?… You will have a team who are happy to be ‘be-be-being’ and won’t mind when the pace gets pacey. Think about how more productive we tend to be when we’re genuinely absorbed in our communities of work. We might still get a rubber mark from that, but that’s alright. It’s when the paint and woodwork gets damaged – that’s when things start going wrong.